Where is "ceteris paribus" NOW that we need it?
Every discipline has a couple of key phrases, those secret passwords that practitioners invoke.. In economics there is "ceteris paribus". It is a way to analyze a situation by looking at one variable and holding all other variables constant. It is a great way to simplify a complex question. But increasingly, those kinds of common courtesies are ignored. Two (related) cases in point come to mind.
The Attorney General approved a search warrant to obtain classified documents from the estate of our former president. Whether or not that was an efficacious strategy to reduce the chance that Trump would protect classified documents appropriately, or even whether the former president should have such documents, is not at issue. I personally thought the raid was a bit overly dramatic. There is a law which stipulates the treatment of presidential records (although interestingly it does not seem to have any sanctions for bad behavior) but after the raid Trump released personal information about the agents who executed the warrant. I think that was bad behavior but there does not seem to be a specific federal statute which prevents someone from publicizing the names. In my mind that really does not matter. As my dad used to say "just because you can, doesn't mean you should."
The parallel story comes from a group called Ruth Sent Me, who thought it was their duty,when they did not agree with the recent decision on abortion (Dobbs v Jackson Women's Health) it was their duty to publicize the home addresses of several Supreme Court justices. In this case, there is a federal statute that prohibits disclosure of the Justice's address and also in picketing in front of their residences. But the Ruth Sent Me people thought it was ok because they really disagreed with the decision.
In both cases, Trump's and Ruth Sent Me's, the actions were inappropriate, whether or not there is a specific law against such behavior. But neither cared about holding other variables constant. In both cases because they held strong beliefs about the search warrant and the draft decision, they could move everything all in. Basic standards of decency in society will not work very well with that kind of idiocy.
We clearly live in times when reasonable social restraints are ignored by a significant fraction of society. Andrew Mir, writing in the Summer Issue of City Journal, argues that as newspapers moved from an advertising model (where adds supported Journalism) to a subscriber model - the propensity to pander to the subscriber's whims increased significantly. That may be part of the problem we face in the quest to have reasoned discussions - we have created echo chambers.
I had so many conversations over the last couple of weeks with friends who are genuinely grumpy about how strident their friends on the left or right are. I have the great good fortune to have friends who believe Trump is the devil incarnate and others who believe that Trump had the election stolen from him. I don't believe either meme; but those polarizations diminish our ability to try to figure out what is happening in a particular area. And ultimately what is the right thing to do for the largest fraction of our fellow citizens.
UPDATE ON OCITEFACL This week confirmed two new things. First, my design editor has come up with a dandy cover for the book. Victoria Vinton (www.coyotepressgraphics.com) sent me what I think is called a pre-print of the book. That means all the text has been converted into a file which can be sent to my publisher. My job this week was to go through the manuscript for the 1100th time and look for things which did not look right. Yesterday I sent her back the PDF so she could make the edits. At the same time she sent me proposals for the "wrap" the front cover and the side backing. Victoria proposed using a brown highlight for the author's name. Our daughter suggested that when people are asking for the book in a bookstore they could simply ask for the brown one.